Major changes in the Dutch tax treatment of real estate

20/09/23

This article was last updated on 19 December 2023, following the Senate's vote on the 2024 Tax Plan Package and related amendments.

The adopted Tax Plan 2024 package includes various measures for the real estate sector. In this article you find a summary of the most relevant:

  • A fiscal investment institution (fiscale beleggingsinstelling, FBI being the Dutch equivalent of the REIT) will no longer be allowed to invest in Dutch real estate directly. As a result, FBIs that directly invest in Dutch real estate, can no longer apply the 0 percent corporate income tax rate.
  • The tax qualification rules for mutual funds (fonds voor gemene rekening, FGR) is amended such that the qualification as non-transparent fund is only available to funds qualifying as fund under the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (implementing the AIFMD).
  • The Dutch tax qualification rules for partnerships are amended such that Dutch and comparable foreign partnerships will be tax transparent irrespective the transferability of the partnership interests.
  • The real estate transfer tax exemption for certain share deals will be restricted.

Fiscal Investment Institutions (fiscale beleggingsinstelling, FBI)

An FBI is subject to corporate income tax against a rate of 0 percent. In order to qualify as an FBI, certain conditions, including shareholder, distribution, financing and governance requirements, need to be met. Furthermore, the activities of an FBI may only consist of portfolio investment activities.

Under the new rules, which enter into force as per 1 January 2025, corporate taxpayers can no longer apply the FBI regime in case they directly invest in real estate located in the Netherlands. Such investment institutions become taxed against the statutory CIT rates of (currently) 25.8 percent. FBIs are still allowed to indirectly invest in Dutch real estate, i.e., via a (non-transparent) subsidiary or directly in real estate located outside the Netherlands. The purpose of this change of law is to ensure that income deriving from Dutch real estate is always subject to Dutch corporate income taxation.

Contrary to what was indicated in the internet consultation, a Dutch FBI is still allowed to engage in the management of a related real estate entity. Furthermore, the so-called financing requirement has not been amended, meaning that the current requirement that financing with debt may not exceed 60 percent of the book value of the real estate remains applicable, for example for direct investments in foreign real estate. For other investments, debt financing is limited to a maximum of 20 percent of the tax book value of those investments.

A temporary real estate transfer tax exemption is introduced to allow FBIs to restructure into a tax transparent mutual fund. This exemption is only applicable in 2024 and applies only to the acquisition of beneficial ownership of real estate by participants in a tax transparent mutual funds (the acquisition of legal ownership is therefore not exempt under this temporary measure). Such a restructuring is particularly an alternative for FBIs of which the shareholders (partially) exist of tax-exempt investors, such as pension funds.

In order to qualify for the temporary real estate transfer tax exemption, it is required that:

  1. the beneficial ownership is acquired from a legal entity that qualifies as an FBI at the time immediately prior to the acquisition of the beneficial ownership and which would not have qualified as such at that time if the changes in the FBI regime had already come into effect;
  2. beneficial ownership is obtained in the form of a participation in an entity that is transparent for Dutch tax purposes to which entity the FBI has contributed that beneficial ownership;
  3. the acquirer is equally entitled to the assets of the tax transparent entity as it was through the shares in the FBI.

A real estate transfer tax return must be filed in which the temporary exemption is claimed.

Furthermore, an aggregation scheme has been included, which in short ensures the levy of real estate transfer tax in the event that one or more acquisitions of shares in a real estate entity are followed within a period of two years by one or more acquisitions of participations in a tax transparent entity, after application of the aforementioned temporary exemption, and those acquisitions result to the acquirer acquiring an interest of one third or more in the investment institution.

Exempt Investment Institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling, VBI)

As of 1 January 2025, only regulated vehicles under the Dutch Financial Supervision Law (Wet financieel toezicht) are eligible to the Dutch Exempt Investment Institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling, VBI) regime. Under the regime of the Dutch Exempt Investment Institutions investing in real estate is not allowed, so the impact of these rules for the real estate industry is limited. 

Mutual funds (fondsen voor gemene rekening, FGR)

As per 1 January 2025, the conditions under which a mutual fund (including a comparable foreign mutual fund) qualifies as transparent will change. The aim is to bring the transparency rules for Dutch investment funds more in line with international standards. Furthermore, the goal of the changes is to limit the non-transparent FGRs to funds qualifying as a fund under the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (ICBE or AIF). As from 2025, FGRs will only be considered non-transparent (and hence subject to Dutch corporate income tax and possibly applying specific tax exempt fund regimes) if:

  1. the fund is an AIF or ICBE within the meaning of article 1:1 of the Financial Supervision Act; and
  2. the units in the FGR are transferable, whereby units are considered non-transferable in case the units can only be transferred to the FGR itself via redemption (‘redemption mechanism’).

If the above conditions are not met, the FGR is considered transparent for Dutch tax purposes. Under current law, FGRs are also considered non-transparent in case a participant is allowed to transfer its participations in the FGR without the unanimous consent of all the other participants. This category of non-transparent FGRs will therefore be considered tax transparent as from 2025.

In case a current non-transparent FGR converts into a tax transparent FGR, this will have tax implications at the level of the fund as well as at the level of the investors. All the assets and liabilities of the FGR are deemed to be transferred to the unit holders against the fair market value. Corresponding gains are subject to corporate income tax at the level of the fund. In addition the unit holders are deemed to have transferred their units against fair market value. Any related gain may be subject to corporate income tax or personal income tax at the level of the taxable participants. Therefore, certain temporary facilities become available:

  1. A roll-over facility whereby the tax claim on the hidden and tax reserves and goodwill present in the FGR is rolled over to the unit holders subject to Dutch corporate income tax. This facility only applies in case all the participants are subject to Dutch corporate income taxation.
  2. A share merger facility, based on which participations can be contributed to a company in exchange for shares. Any gain realized on the contribution of the participation will be rolled-over in the tax basis of the new shares issued by the company.
  3. A temporary and conditional exemption for real estate transfer tax in relation to the share merger mentioned under 2. A real estate transfer tax return must be filed in which the temporary exemption is claimed.

In case a taxpayer cannot use the roll-over facility mentioned under 1, a payment in installments of the corporate tax due over a period of maximum ten years is available.

The temporary facilities are applicable as from 1 January 2024, so that taxpayers can apply them prior to the change of qualification in 2025.

Tax classification rules partnerships

The Dutch qualification rules for Dutch and foreign partnerships will change as from 1 January 2025.

The aim of the measure is to reduce the number of hybrid mismatches in an international context. In particular, the adopted rules should result in less hybrid mismatches due to the asymmetric qualification of entities. Discrepancies in the fiscal qualification of entities between countries may result in income either being taxed twice (i.e., at the level of the entity and at the level of its participants) or not at all.

Under the adopted rules, the ‘unanimous consent requirement’ is revoked as it is the source of many hybrid mismatches in the Netherlands that cause the application of ATAD2 hybrid mismatch rules. Based on the current ‘unanimous consent requirement’, a Dutch limited partnership (commanditaire vennootschap, CV) and Dutch partnerships with a capital divided into shares are considered non-transparent for Dutch corporate income tax purposes if the admission or replacement of limited partners is possible without the consent of all other partners. Based on these measures, CVs and other Dutch partnerships as well as comparable foreign partnerships will always be transparent under the new rules and will not be liable to Dutch corporate income tax nor to Dutch dividend withholding tax or conditional withholding tax. As of 1 January 2025 the partners of these partnerships become liable to Dutch – corporate or personal – income tax for their participation in the partnership. We also refer to our extended analysis in ‘Changes in qualification open LP’s and foreign legal forms’.

For CVs, other partnerships and comparable foreign partnerships that qualify as non-transparent for Dutch corporate income tax purposes before 1 January 2025, the change to transparency (by fiction) results in the deemed transfer of their assets and liabilities to the partners for the fair market value. Corresponding gains are subject to corporate income tax at the level of the partnership. In addition the partners are deemed to have transferred their partnership interest against fair market value. Any related gain is subject to corporate income tax or personal income tax at the level of the taxable participants. Therefore, certain temporary facilities is introduced:

  1. A roll-over facility whereby the tax claim on the hidden and tax reserves and goodwill present in the partnership is taken over by the limited partners who are subject to corporate tax. This facility only applies in case all the participants are subject to corporate income taxation.
  2. A share merger facility, based on which the participation in the partnership can be contributed to a company in exchange for shares. Any gain realized on the contribution of the participation will be rolled-over in the tax basis of the new shares issued by the company.

A temporary and conditional exemption for real estate transfer tax in relation to the share merger mentioned under 2. A real estate transfer tax return must be filed in which the temporary exemption is claimed.

In case a taxpayer cannot use the roll-over facility mentioned under 1,a payment in installments of the corporate tax due over a period of maximum ten years is available.

The temporary facilities are applicable as from 1 January 2024, so that taxpayers can apply them prior to the change of qualification in 2025.

Income allocation rules for partnerships, FGRs and comparable foreign entities

In addition to the change in the qualification rules for partnerships and FGRs, the measures also contain a prescription on the basis of which assets and liabilities as well as the revenues and costs of a tax transparent entity are directly allocated to the participants. On this basis, the participant has to take into account these elements separately and not on a net basis as (revenues from) the participation in the transparent entity. This may result in additional tax compliance obligations.

Limitation tax depreciation on buildings for personal income tax purposes

Depreciation on buildings is only possible if the book value is higher than the ground value of the building. For income tax purposes, the ground value for buildings made available to third parties is equal to the so-called WOZ value and for buildings in own use 50 percent of the WOZ- value. For corporate income tax purposes, the ground value for buildings in own use is already equal to the WOZ value since January 1, 2019. This becomes also applicable for personal income tax purposes. After this amendment, for personal income tax purposes depreciation up to a maximum of the WOZ-value applies to all buildings that are used as business assets, regardless of whether it is an investment building or a building for own use.

This adjustment removes the distinction in depreciation limitations on buildings for personal and corporate income tax purposes.

Generic interest deduction limitation (ATAD I)

Although no proposal of law has been published yet, it has been announced that the generic interest deduction limitation (the so-called 'earnings stripping rules') with regard to real estate companies will be changed as of 1 January 2025. Under current law, interest expenses for Dutch corporate tax purposes are limited in deduction to the extent that the net financing costs exceed the higher of EUR 1 million or 20% of EBITDA (adjusted for tax purposes). As of 1 January 2025, the EUR 1 million threshold no longer applies to entities that own real estate that is rented (to third parties). For these tax payers financing costs exceeding 20% of EBITDA becomes non-deductible.

Treatment of share transactions for Real estate transfer tax

The so-called ‘concurrence exemption’ in the Dutch RETT legislation will be adjusted for the situation in which shares in a so-called 'real estate rich companies ' are acquired. Based on the current scheme, this exemption applies if the real estate property held by the company consists of new real estate for VAT purposes. If the real estate property is used for VAT-exempt activities, VAT can be saved by transferring the shares in the company that holds the real estate property. The transfer of shares is not subject to VAT and if the real estate property qualifies as new for VAT purposes, an exemption from RETT can still be applied. To avoid these savings, as of 1 January 2025, the exemption only applies to share transactions if the real estate property held by the company is used by the company - during a period of two years after acquisition - for activities that for at least 90 percent give entitlement to deduct VAT on costs. In other cases, where the real estate property held qualifies as new for VAT purposes, real estate transfer tax will be due at a rate of 4 percent. The 4 percent rate is based on the estimated VAT savings on a share transaction.

A transitional rule applies based on which the current rules can still be applied till 1 January 2030 if:

  1. parties agreed in writing the acquisition of the shares before 19 September 2023, 3.15 p.m.; and
  2. the acquirer has requested the Dutch tax authorities for application of the transitional rule before 1 April 2024 at the latest, which request encloses a copy of the written agreement; and
  3. at the time the agreement was concluded, it was plausible that the main purpose of the agreement was not to qualify for the so-called ‘concurrence exemption’.

What does it mean for your organization?

Fiscal Investment Institutions (fiscale beleggingsinstelling, FBI)

The changes in the FBI regime have a very significant impact on FBIs investing in Dutch real estate as income from Dutch real estate will become subject to the regular CIT rate rather than the 0% rate currently applicable to these FBI’s. For listed FBI’s investing in Dutch real estate (REITs) there is no real alternative than to accept the higher CIT levy. Many of the Dutch non-listed FBI’s we expect to restructure to a tax transparent FGR in order to offer their (tax exempt) investors a gross (before) tax return on Dutch real estate investors. This can be achieved free from real estate transfer tax by using the temporary exemption that has been introduced specifically for these restructurings. Also foreign funds investing in Dutch real estate directly and applying the FBI regime will become subject to Dutch CIT at the ordinary rate. For FBIs not investing in Dutch real estate directly the consequences of the new rules should be limited.

Exempt Investment Institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling, VBI)

As under the regime of the Dutch Exempt Investment Institutions investing in real estate is not allowed, so the impact of these rules for the real estate industry is limited. 

Mutual funds (fonds voor gemene rekening, FGR)

As a result of the change of the tax qualification rules for FGRs the use of non-transparent FGRs (also called ‘Open FGR’) is, broadly speaking, limited to funds that qualify as ICBE or AIF under the AIFMD directive which is implemented in the Dutch Financial Supervision Act. Under the new rules these FGRs will be non-transparent only if the participations are transferable other than by way of redemption by the fund. As a result of the new rules, mutual funds whose investors form a closed group, such as family funds, will no longer qualify as taxable (non-transparent) and will be transparent as from 2025. These funds and their investors have to identify the tax consequences of the changed qualification and, if necessary, restructure whether or not making use of the transition rules offered by the legislator (refer to the above). For the FGRs that are already tax transparent under current rules, the consequences are expected to be limited, unless the FGR is an investment fund within the meaning of article 1:1 of the Financial Supervision Act. These funds will have to assess whether they continue to be classified as tax transparent under the new rules. Foreign mutual funds investing in Dutch real estate will have to assess their tax qualification under the new rules.

Classification rules partnerships

The adopted rules have a major impact on partnerships qualifying as non-transparent for Dutch tax purposes (such as the an Open CV and comparable foreign partnerships) as these partnerships become tax transparent as from 2025. Many foreign partnerships are currently regarded as non-transparent for Dutch tax purposes, because foreign countries do not use the ‘unanimous consent criterion’ as a condition for tax transparency. As a result of the legislative change, all Open CVs and other non-transparent (foreign) partnerships will be regarded tax transparent for Dutch tax purposes with effect from 2025. In principle, this means that the partnership has to make a final settlement for Dutch corporate tax purposes, resulting in taxation over the tax and hidden reserves, for example included in the real estate assets held by the partnership. To prevent this taxation, a roll-over facility becomes available but is only available if all partners in the partnership are subject to corporate income tax. In case natural persons or tax exempt investors are participant in the partnership, the facility is not applicable. For those situations, it would be possible that the partners not subject to Dutch corporate income tax first transfer the interest in the partnership into a company such as a limited liability company (besloten vennootschap, BV) in 2024. For this contribution, a temporary share merger facility is available for both personal income tax, corporate tax and real estate transfer tax purposes. If after this contribution all the participants in the partnership are subject to Dutch corporate income tax, the forementioned roll-over facility can be applied at the level of the partnership upon the change of the tax status of the partnership from non-transparent to tax transparent. In this way, a non-transparent partnership structure can be restructured into into a corporate structure.

Foreign non-transparent partnerships are regarded as tax transparent as from 2025. This means that these partnerships, to the extent they receive domestic income, are no longer subject to Dutch corporate income tax. For Dutch tax purposes, the assets, liabilities revenues and costs of the partnership will be allocated to the (foreign) partners in the partnership on a pro rata basis resulting in additional tax compliance obligations. From 2025 onwards, a foreign partnership is also no longer regarded as recipient/beneficiary for dividend withholding tax or conditional withholding tax (bronbelasting) purposes.

Dutch and foreign partnerships that qualify as non-transparent under current Dutch transparency rules, with a qualifying interest in a Dutch company, may be confronted with a conditional withholding tax on dividends in 2024 on the basis of the so-called hybrid provision in the Withholding Tax Act 2021. The Withholding Tax Act 2021 has been expanded with a withholding tax on dividends with effect from 2024.

This accumulation of the Tax Qualification of Legal Entities Act and the Withholding Tax Act 2021 is unintentional. The latter contains a provision on the basis of which hybrid entities (such as the open CV or a comparable foreign entity) are regarded as taxpayers for the Withholding Tax Act 2021. On the basis of the Tax Qualification of Legal Entities Act, the open CV will expire as of 1 January 2025 (and not, as the legislator intended, as of 1 January 2024). As a result of both measures, it may happen that during a period of one year - 2024 - dividend withholding tax can be levied under the Withholding Tax Act 2021 when an open CV (or a comparable foreign entity) is qualified differently in the Netherlands (i.e. as non-transparent) than abroad (i.e. as transparent).

A recent amendment to the Tax Qualification of Legal Entities Act responds to this unintended accumulation. The measure in the amendment provides for a transitional measure for the year 2024 for open CVs (or comparable foreign entities) that become liable to dividend withholding tax in 2024 on the basis of the provision for hybrid entities in the 2021 Withholding Tax Act. The transitional measure implies that the open CV (or a comparable foreign entity) will de facto be regarded as transparent in 2024 for the application of the Withholding Tax Act 2021 with regard to dividends. For dividends, it then applies that it is not the open CV (or the comparable foreign entity) as such, but each participant who has an interest in it, is - in proportion to its entitlement - regarded as the person entitled to those dividends. 

 

Generic interest deduction limitation (ATAD I)

The adopted change will have significant consequences for the real estate sector. For entities that invest in real estate that is rented (to third parties), the threshold of EUR 1 million will no longer be applicable, which may increase the amount of non-deductible interest for these entities as per 1 January 2025.

Treatment of share transactions for Real estate transfer tax

It is expected that the current advantages in share deals, whereby new real estate property (for VAT purposes) is held by a legal entity per 1 January 2025 effectively no longer lead to VAT savings, as a compensatory levy of real estate transfer tax is introduced.

Furthermore, it becomes more important to what extent the real estate properties held by the legal entity are used for activities that give a right to VAT deduction.

For agreements regarding share deals, concluded before 19 September 2023, 3:15 p.m., the current rules could under conditions still apply, provided the Dutch tax authorities are requested for application of the transitional rule for 1 April 2024 at the latest.

Contact us

Jeroen Elink Schuurman

Jeroen Elink Schuurman

Global Real Estate Tax Leader, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)65 398 48 10

Serge de Lange

Serge de Lange

Industry Leader Real Estate and Tax Partner, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)65 368 66 60

Matthijs Vogel

Matthijs Vogel

Partner, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)61 351 50 55

Clarinca van Veelen

Clarinca van Veelen

Director, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)61 229 49 69

Follow us