VAT margin scheme for artworks supplied via legal entities

05/08/25

On August 1, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union ('CJEU') released its judgment in the case of Galerie Karsten Greve (C-433/24). In short, the CJEU rules that the VAT margin scheme can also be applied when the work of art is supplied via a legal entity. This requires the supply of the artwork to be attributable to the creator or its successors and to be the first introduction of the artwork to the EU market. This case may have significant impact on businesses in the art sector such as auction houses, galleries or art dealers.

Background

The case involves Galerie Karsten Greve (GKG), an art gallery operating in France. In 2014, GKG made intra-Community acquisitions of paintings by artist Gideon Rubin from Studio Rubin Gideon (SRG), a UK-established company in which Rubin is a partner. GKG subsequently applied the VAT margin scheme to the sales of these paintings to its customers.

Following an audit, French tax authorities challenged GKG's application of the margin scheme and issued additional VAT assessments. The authorities argued that the margin scheme was not applicable because the paintings were not supplied directly by their creator.

Lower courts upheld the tax authorities' position, ruling that only the individual artist, not a legal entity like SRG, could be considered the 'creator' under the relevant VAT laws. GKG appealed these decisions to the Conseil d'État, France's highest administrative court.

The Conseil d'État has referred questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for clarification on whether the EU VAT Directive allows a legal person, such as a company, to be considered the 'creator' of a work of art for the purposes of applying the margin scheme. Additionally, if such an interpretation is possible, the court seeks guidance on the criteria to be considered in determining when a legal person can be regarded as the 'creator' within the meaning of these provisions.

CJEU judgment

The court clarified that the VAT margin scheme can indeed apply to such supplies under specific conditions. The court established a set of criteria to determine whether the margin scheme can be applied to purchases of artwork from their creator or successor via a legal person. The criteria are as follows:

1.    Legal Entities on behalf of Creators: The CJEU ruled that works of art supplied by its creator or their successors through legal persons can qualify for the VAT margin scheme. This interpretation ensures fiscal neutrality and prevents distortions in the art market.

2.    Attribution to the Creators: For the VAT margin scheme to apply, the supply by the legal person must be attributable to the author or their successors. This is typically the case if the legal entity was established for the purpose of marketing the artist's works.

3.    First Introduction into the EU Market: The scheme is only applicable if the supply constitutes the first introduction of the artwork into the EU market, with no previous VAT-taxed supply of the artwork.

The CJEU also considered whether criteria such as the analysis of management roles or profit distribution within the legal entity could be used to determine the attribution to the creator. The court found this too cumbersome from an administrative point of view, and the aforementioned simplified criteria were deemed sufficient.

What does this mean for your business?

If your organization is involved in the art world—whether as an auction house, gallery, or art dealer—this recent clarification regarding the application of the VAT margin scheme to artwork purchased from legal entities may be highly significant. It is common for artists to operate through business vehicles to manage and market their works, and the new case law provides much-needed clarity on the possibility of applying the margin scheme in such circumstances.

The European Court of Justice has now confirmed that the margin scheme can apply to works of art supplied by a legal person, provided that the supply is attributable to the author or their successors in title and constitutes the first introduction of the artwork into the EU market. This means that, where an artist has established a company specifically to market their own works, sales from that company to a taxable dealer may qualify for the margin scheme, as long as there has not been a previous VAT-taxed supply of the work.

 

This clarification is particularly welcome given the previous uncertainty and limitations on the application of the margin scheme in cases where the reduced VAT rate is available in several EU Member States, including the Netherlands and France. The ruling also simplifies the criteria for eligibility, rejecting the need for complex assessments of shareholding, management roles, or profit distribution within the legal entity.

Feel free to reach out to your trusted PwC Indirect Tax advisor to help you assess whether the margin scheme is applicable to any areas of your business, ensuring you do not miss out on potential optimisation opportunities.

Contact us

Bart van Osch

Bart van Osch

Senior Director, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)65 395 10 13

Jack Hutchinson

Jack Hutchinson

Senior Associate - Indirect Taxes, PwC Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)63 419 19 96

Follow us